Dear All,

ICANN staff has prepared a Google document with all proposed recommendations and instructed the working group to identify proposed recommendations that stakeholders CANNOT LIVE WITH. Deadline for this is set to June 3, 2024.

The objective for this exercise is to identify any recommendations that must be "re-opened" for discussion.

The goal is to start the Public Comment phase in (late) August 2024.

CPWG version of the proposed recommendations

I have made a copy of the document with the proposed recommendations. The document is open for commenting for all with the link.

I kindly ask for your input to the proposed recommendations that - in your view, is a recommendation that At-Large CANNOT LIVE WITH.

ICANN staff has added a "Policy Impact Level": Low, Medium, High

• An example of a LOW impact would be a definitional change, e.g., “Change of Registrant” to “Change of Registrant Data.”
• An example of a MEDIUM impact would be a change to an existing requirement or a new requirement.
• An example of a HIGH impact would be removing a previous requirement, such as the removal of the Post Change of Registrant 60-day transfer restriction.

Criteria to consider when gauging impact:

• Degree of change from existing requirement? [No change or confirm existing; Modification to existing req.; or New req.]
• Security enhancement or detraction
• Level of technical change (impact to CPs)
• ICANN Contractual Compliance enforcement capability
• RNH impacts (such as increased or reduced protections; level of confusion)

Regards,

Steinar Grøtterød

At-Large representative to the GNSO-TPR PDP