I really like their comment on rec 5,7 and 10,11 and believe it resonates with ours as well. I hope that the ePDP would reconsider her position, it's amazing that this isn't obvious to other ePDP stakeholders (especially the NCSG)

Thanks for sharing.

Cheers!

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, 07:45 Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca wrote:

Those following the EPDP will find this interesting.

Alan

>From: "Heineman, Ashley" <AHeineman@ntia.doc.gov>
>To: GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:54:20 +0000
>Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
>
>Dear Kurt,
>
>Please find attached a statement for including in the phase 1 final
>report from the GAC small group. FWIW - this does NOT represent an
>objection to the consensus calls or the report itself.
>
>Thanks kindly,
>
>Ashley Heineman
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg