Further to the previous e-mail, here are two other issues that appeared on several slides.

Slide #7

URS Recommendation #6 --

The Working Group recommends that a uniform set of

educational materials be developed to provide guidance

for URS parties, practitioners, and examiners on what is

needed to meet the “clear and convincing burden of proof" in a URS proceeding

Question to CPWG: Who should bear the cost of these materials. Should this be URS

providers? Who has the most to gain from

this? Who will be neutral.

Slide 18 - Sunrise service community question #5c

Do you have suggestions on how to enable trademark

holders who use non-English scripts/languages to

effectively participate in Sunrise

Question to CPWG: Should we try to provide some answer

to this question 5(c), consistent with principles of support

Thanks

Marita