It's not wrong, but its context is disingenuous. 

At its superficial level it's fear-mongering (you can't automatically trust a domain just 'cause it's in dot-org, a characteristic common to almost all TLDs). 

At a deeper level it's an attempt to discredit (or at least dilute) the massive and nearly universal opposition to the PIR conversion by non-profit organizations.

On the whole I consider it a FUD piece. 

___________________
Evan Leibovitch, Toronto
@evanleibovitch/@el56

On Fri., Dec. 6, 2019, 1:29 a.m. Jonathan Zuck, <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
Agreed! That said, it's not wrong.

Jonathan Zuck
Executive Director
Innovators Network Foundation

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:05:52 PM
To: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>
Cc: LAC-Discuss-en <lac-discuss-en@icann.org>; CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CPWG] NYTimes: The .Org Mirage
 
Clearly the crisis-management PR firm hired by ISOC is busy earning its keep. 

___________________
Evan Leibovitch, Toronto
@evanleibovitch/@el56