The ICANN Org comment was submitted through GDS (Global Domains & Strategy, formerly GDD, and headed by Theresa Swinehart) so not nameless; I merely dispensed with sharing cover letters, so that's my bad.
As for your remark on PIC enforcement, I suggest that the need to ensure that all PICs (and RVCs, for that matter) are prescribed in a way that they will clearly fall or can be considered as falling within ICANN's remit becomes even more urgent.
Justine
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 15:51, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Justine,
A nameless ICANN Org has commented? Is this common?
As for the Board comment, I note the issue of PIC enforcement is an
issue since the Bylaws have tightened the Board's ability to do
anything that could be deemed outside its Mission. I wonder how,
with a tight interpretation of the Bylaws, the Public Interest can
be upheld.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 01/10/2020 06:16, Justine Chew
wrote:
For those interested, here are some of the
submissions to the public comment process for the Subsequent
Procedures Draft Final Report that closed on 30 Sep 2020:
We may want to pay particular attention to the comments by
the ICANN Board.
These are shared by way of links in case attachments are
inadvertently filtered out during mail list distribution.
Kind regards,
Justine
---
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.