Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
Thananswer is both yes an no.
First, you should remove the "complies with GDPR" part. That is
a given it is not an option. Period. But exactly WHAT will be deemed to
comply with GDPR is the real question. And that is what the discussion is
really about.
*I* want to make information that will be useful to cybersecurity folks
and those who create reputation serves and spam filters as easy for them
to access as possible.
SO: How to create "easy as possible" access to those ones without extending a hand to the non reputable ones seem to be one of my personal concern
Other want to erect high and difficult barriers.
Those barriers may come in the form of the detailed rational for every
bit of information, or whether the process is automated or
manual.
SO: Unless you don't think "legitimate" access is important, I don't see how barriers won't exist, though I agree it mustn't be difficult and shouldn't if the mechanism is clearly layed out.
If cyber security/spam filtering effort will be efficient then there needs to be an effort to put them ahead of what is accessible in the public hence a gated access for legitimate purpose may be required.
Personally I think it may be easy to identify legitimate request from agencies involved in cyber security but that of spam filtering agencies is a loose cannon IMO. If an AntiVirus provider claim they are looking to see a virus free OS, better run!
Regards