I agree Alan. Regarding "Improvements will be needed. Some level of registration and authentication of applicants would be an advantage, but it should not be too cumbersome."

Why is the digital signature system not used?

There are many governments that offer digital signature services. Interested parties in each country should digitally certify themselves before that local system and at the other end would be ICANN: I don't know if each government would do it for free or for a fee.

There are private providers of digital signature services, but I don't know the cost at this time.

 

Regards

 

Alberto

 

De: Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Enviado el: domingo, 27 de octubre de 2024 00:18
Para: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Asunto: [CPWG] Talking points for Board consultation on RDRS

 

• A system such as the RDRS/SSAD is needed, but its use by Registrars (and Registries) should be mandatory.
• Enhancements will be needed. Some level of requestor registration and authentication would be an asset, but it must not be overly cumbersome.
• Although the RDRS is not perfect, it should not be shut down until an enhanced or replacement system is available.
• The system must include legitimate access to Privacy/Proxy beneficial user information
• Implementation of national laws and regulations will introduce specific registrar and registry requirements. ICANN policy needs to ensure a level playing field.

• The At-Large Community hopes that a mandatory and uniform system will strengthen trust and transparency between end users and businesses
• ICANN org should consider reassessing the operational cost of implementing SSAD recommendations as it will provide insight in how those specifications should be altered.