Dear Justine,

A nameless ICANN Org has commented? Is this common?

As for the Board comment, I note the issue of PIC enforcement is an issue since the Bylaws have tightened the Board's ability to do anything that could be deemed outside its Mission. I wonder how, with a tight interpretation of the Bylaws, the Public Interest can be upheld.
Kindest regards,

Olivier

On 01/10/2020 06:16, Justine Chew wrote:
For those interested, here are some of the submissions to the public comment process for the Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report that closed on 30 Sep 2020:

We may want to pay particular attention to the comments by the ICANN Board.

These are shared by way of links in case attachments are inadvertently filtered out during mail list distribution.

Kind regards,

Justine
---

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html