Thank you sir for sharing these.
I have always loved the way the SSAC's positions are communicated; straight up, no chaser.
So, this workbook thing. Why would the contracted parties object to its inclusion as a referent source even as they accept it is 'informational'? In parliamentary process the Hansard which records all the talk and ruminations on a piece of legislation is considered critical to interpretation of the legal framework that emerge!
Finally, NCSG dissenting - on purpose[s]. I would have thought those were consensus bound from the git go! Seem to be an alignment on Recommendations #16 and #17 too, even as the dissenters acknowledge that GDPR - and correlated Data Protection laws - now obtains for natural, not legal persons.
-Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================