Yes, this seems to be ignoring our opinions expressed.

However, as the gTLD market is already over-saturated, I believe the results of another round will work against those who are pushing for it. Thus, after saying what should be said, we may just wait and see ... ALAC will be be blamed anyway.

Also, if there is going to be another CCT-RT for that round, I would gladly volunteer for it. : )

Kaili

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 1:01 AM cw@christopherwilkinson.eu <cw@christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:

Indeed:

1. The ICANN working paper ignores several key points that have been raised in the PDP, by ALAC, and in the meetings in ICANN65.

2. The Circle ID article by the CEO of Cum Laude, presumably is an embarrassment to the PDP CoChairs.

CW

On 26 Jun 2019, at 02:15, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:

...hmmmm.......

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20190620_icann_announces_planning_for_round_two_of_new_gtlds/

-Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.