Yes.   Super straightforward.

“Human users whose activities IETF standards support, sometimes 
indirectly.  Thus, the end user of a protocol to manage routers is nota router administrator; it is the 
people using the network that the 
router operates within.”


On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:59 PM Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:












Which,  of course, aligns with ours. End user isn't a category of user but a category of use













Jonathan Zuck






Innovators Network Foundation














From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Javier Rua <javrua@gmail.com>


Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 4:51:17 PM


To: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net>


Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>


Subject: Re: [CPWG] RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users


 






Agree @Holly







On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:50 PM Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:






Finally - a definition of ‘end user’ from the tech community - which, of course, I will use.






Holly







On Aug 30, 2020, at 6:37 AM, <alberto@soto.net.ar> <alberto@soto.net.ar> wrote:









I like this: “Successful specifications will provide some benefit to all the


   relevant parties because standards do not represent a zero-sum game.


   However, there are sometimes situations where there is a conflict


   between the needs of two (or more) parties.


 


   In these situations, when one of those parties is an "end user" of


   the Internet -- for example, a person using a web browser, mail


   client, or another agent that connects to the Internet -- the


   Internet Architecture Board argues that the IETF should favor their


   interests over those of other parties.”


 






De: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> En

nombre de 
Jonathan Zuck


Enviado el: sábado, 29 de agosto de 2020 17:22


Para: Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj@gmail.com>


CC: cpwg@icann.org


Asunto: Re: [CPWG] RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users






 




And in the near term, Holly might want to bring it up during her DOH webinar...






 




Jonathan Zuck


Innovators Network Foundation


www.InnovatorsNetwork.org













From: Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj@gmail.com>


Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 4:20:10 PM


To: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>


Cc: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org>


Subject: Re: [CPWG] RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users




 












Thank you David,








@Jonathan, it is worth discussing RFC8890 at at-large.






 






On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:08 PM Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>

wrote:



































 











Thanks David. Very interesting. The At-Large DOES operate on some principles, for sure and this has lead to disagreements with others in things like GDPR compliance and indigenous interests to domain names. It's difficult to be so out numbered but I'll be interested





to see where this goes. Thanks for sharing.




 





 























Jonathan




 












 







From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of David Mackey <mackey361@gmail.com>








Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:49:29 PM








To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>








Subject: [CPWG] RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users





 






 











 







 







 







 







FYI: 











 















































The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) recently published “RFC: 8890 - The Internet is for End Users” which some people in the CPWG may find interesting. 












































The RFC highlights a number of important policy/standards areas that overlap with At-Large policy creation. 












































The IAB seems to feel it’s important for IETF standards to be developed under the guidance of explicitly stated principles. The idea of policy making being guided by explicitly stated principles is something that the At-Large community may wish to consider





too. 


















































































Mark Nottingham’s Blog Post which describes the reasons for publishing RFC 8890.












































Cheers!



















David




 







 







 







 







 

















_______________________________________________





CPWG mailing list





CPWG@icann.org





https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg











_______________________________________________





By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)

and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration,

including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.








-- 










 


 














_______________________________________________


CPWG

mailing list



CPWG@icann.org


https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg





_______________________________________________


By

submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (
https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)

and the website Terms of Service (
https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos).

You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.













_______________________________________________





CPWG mailing list





CPWG@icann.org





https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg











_______________________________________________





By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)

and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing,

setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.