On 14/03/2020 19:37, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
> Oh, I KNOW it needs much more. Like I said, I just started. As for
> coining a phrase, there are plenty of references to it in the literature

Yep but if you want it to be accepted by Wikipedia then you have to add
the citations (Reliable Sources rather than just internal Wikipedia
links) to the draft. Otherwise, it is likely to be rejected. The Dutch
study is a good citation and should be included in the draft. Also any
direct mentions of the phrase "DNS abuse" in print/online publications
would also be good to include. However, steer clear of using blogs for
citations even if they are written by experts. The more citations from
Reliable Sources a draft has, the less likely it is to be rejected or
deleted.

If you think that things can get a bit argumentative on ICANN lists,
there's nothing quite like a Wikipedia Holy War. :)

Regards...jmcc
--
**********************************************************
John McCormac  *  e-mail: jmcc@hosterstats.com
MC2            *  web: http://www.hosterstats.com/
22 Viewmount   *  Domain Registrations Statistics
Waterford      *  Domnomics - the business of domain names
Ireland        *  https://amzn.to/2OPtEIO
IE             *  Skype: hosterstats.com
**********************************************************