Given that today is the due-date and this is not a formal ALAC public statement, I would leave it be.

You could replace the sentence 

However, we have strong opinions on the issue based on input from trusted law enforcement entities, and consumer protection and fraud specialists.

with

However, a prime At-Large mandate is the protection of Internet end users, and on input from trusted law enforcement entities, and consumer protection and fraud specialists indicates that registration data accuracy is a significant problem.

Note that the Googledoc pointer is no longer current. See the At-Large Workspace (https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=543260704) or the link to the google doc that is pending ratification in case the wiki is not working (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JJ8u8aSYQYoIwKHLVHTXjDlj5N_umG7AkEQwBgx-wDk/edit?usp=sharing).


Alan





On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 2:02 PM Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:

Thanks for your work on this! As I read it, it seems to be missing the end user impact assessment that we have begun to incorporate in such comments. We make the point that we’re not the experts but instead rely on the expertise of others but could we site some of those experts to lay out a few bullets that tie this exercise back to our mandate and remit?

 

From: Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 12:10 PM
To: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>
Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>; ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Michael Palage <michael@palage.com>
Subject: Statement on Registration Data Accuracy

 

Jonathan, the statement in response to the GNSO query related to registration data accuracy is not finalized.

 

It is a significant enhancement on the version discussed during yesterday's CPWG meeting, but is identical in its overall intent.

 

It is a much stronger and hopefully effective message.

 

It was a collaborative effort of Michael, Cheryl, Justine and me.

 

 

Alan