That's only 1/3 of the NCPH. But don't forget the SSAC which does have a
bit of clout.
We did formally endorse the last GAC statement which was substantially
the same as the EPDP part of the Communique.
There are other parts of the Communique where we may not be in quite the
same lock-step. Haven't really looked at it from that
perspective.
Alan
At 2020-06-29 08:58 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 20:07,
Greg Shatan
<greg@isoc-ny.org> wrote:
- I think the only groups that are happy with the EPDP process are the
Contracted Parties
Too often in ICANN that's often enough to get something through. A
concerted opposition by nearly everyone else (NCPH + ALAC+GAC) means the
public interest has a fighting chance.
I suggest that a small item in the next ALAC meeting include a formal
endorsement of the GAC position if it's as aligned with ours as Alan
says.
- Evan