Let's
briefly put aside the boasting about ALAC's incremental
involvement in the trivial agendas set by ICANN's vested
interests. Here's a real example of an issue that can
negatively affect end-users. The aims of the proposed
modification may be laudable, but there's too much room for
arbitrariness and too much potential to curb political speech
unwanted by a government.
BTW ...
Why was this not already flagged by ALAC as cause for concern?
Why did I have to find out about this in the media rather than
from the inside. Was ALAC intending to ignore it?
This is
EXACTLY what I'm talking about. ALAC is obsessed with the
trivial and the self-absorbed, but asleep during the issues
that actually affect the constituency we're supposed to serve.
Does ALAC
have what it takes to fight for the public interest on
something that actually matters?
Is it
capable of balancing the various intertwining issues? If the
CPWG meets on this issue I'll be there.
Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
@evanleibovitch / @el56