Colleagues, in last Wednesday's CPWG call, I offered the following suggestions with respect to the comment on evolving the multistakeholder model:
I grouped all 21 issues presented to us on the previous call inside 4 categories -- explicitly recognizing that some of these things fit into various categories.
1. Structural issues
-- Wholistic view (20); Complexity (2); Roles and
responsibilities (15); Terms (21); Accountability (11);Transparency
(12)
2. Process issues --
Precision in scoping (10); Prioritization (4); Efficient use of
resources (16); Work processes (19); Costs (13); Consensus (9);
Timing (1)
3. Participation
issues -- Demographics (5); Recruitment (6); Representativeness
(7); Inclusiveness (8); Volunteer burnout (17)
4. Intergroup relations -- Cultural issues (13); Trust (14); Silos/tribalism (18)
I then suggested that we take each category and present our thoughts on how we can address these issues -- paying attention to the fact that addressing one group of issues will impact issues in other groups. This way of proceeding seemed to meet the approval of those who were on the call.
In continuation,
during the call, we focussed on the "low hanging fruit" here --
namely category 4: Intergroup relations -- i.e the perceived
lack of trust, tribalism and silos, etc. which can result in
stalled processes that can go on forever and eventually lead
nowhere or sometimes result in time consuming and unproductive
negative interactions between groups and/or individuals.
Here are some suggestions offered for potential recommendations on how this group of issues might be addressed:
– that training in
multistakeholder processes be an important part of onboarding
activities
– that consensus be
clearly defined and that all parties to a policy process commit
to the the goal of achieving consensus
– that a culture of
trust be supported by consequences for publicly disparaging
other groups
– a commitment by ICANN to fully address the resource needs (both financial and human resources) of volunteer groups working in the SO/AC communities
I have not yet had an
opportunity to go back to the recording of the call so not all
suggestions are reflected here. However, in the interests of
moving the process along (deadline June 4), please use the
suggestions offered here to begin a discussion on how we should
respond to this call for comments.
Thank you
Marita