Dear All,

Please see below important information for today’s CPWG discussion on Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks within the context of the Transfer Policy Review PDP.

A series of polls will be shown during the discussion. The questions and relevant document are available in Steinar’s note.

Kind regards,

Heidi

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Reply to: Steinar Grøtterød <steinar@recito.no>
Date: Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 4:31 AM
To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Subject: [CPWG] At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks

Dear all CPWG members,

With the object to give background and a constructive discussion at the CPWG meeting, At-Large members in the GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP have created a document focus on the PDP charter questions connected to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks.

The Google document located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] should give the CPWG members the needed information to participate in an informal “poll”:

QUESTION TO BE DISCUSSED BY CPWG MEMBERS

For the post-creation lock question

What lock period will be of preference:

• 10 days post-creation lock
• 30 days post-creation lock
• 60 days post-creation lock 
• Not sure
• Abstain

For the post-transfer lock question

What lock period will be of preference:

• 10 days post-transfer lock
• 30 days post-transfer lock
• 60 days post-transfer lock 
• Not sure
• Abstain

For the question regarding Registry Operator 

• Same policy for all Registry Operator
• A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy
• Not sure
• Abstain

I kindly ask the CPWG members to review the Google document [docs.google.com]. The CPWG chair may decide when to put this on the CPWG agenda.

Regards,

Steinar Grøtterød