Dear all,

I am in favour of At-Large submitting comments and I am willing to be part of WG for this task.

I was ALAC representative in the GNSO-TPR PDP and I agreed to the outcome of the PDP working group. However, in my view we should emphasise the lack of Registrants to initiate a Transfer Dispute. 

Regards,
Steinar Grøtterød

From: ICANN At-Large Staff via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, 1 May 2025 at 21:08
To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>
Subject: [CPWG] Call for Volunteers - Transfer Policy Review Working Group Final Report for ICANN Board Consideration Public Comment

Dear CPWG Members,

 

On behalf of the CPWG co-chairs, we are seeking At-Large Community volunteers to consider the Transfer Policy Review Working Group Final Report for ICANN Board Consideration recently posted for public comment by ICANN org. 

 

Your insights and/or expertise on the subject matter for public comment would be helpful for:

 

As this public comment proceeding will close on 16 June 2025, the proposed schedule for the above-mentioned tasks is as follows:

And if needed,

 

If you are interested in volunteering to be a reviewer, please verbally volunteer during the CPWG call or reach out to the CPWG co-chairs, Olivier Crépin-Leblond (ocl@gih.com) and Avri Doria (avri@doria.org) and cc the At-Large Staff (staff@atlarge.icann.org), by Wednesday, 7 May at 23:59 UTC.

 

Your participation is greatly appreciated, and we look forward to your contributions!

 

Kind Regards,

 

At-Large Staff

ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community

Website: atlarge.icann.org

Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge

Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge