Hello Hadia,

I don't know whether it's going to be read only mode for alternates at the meeting tomorrow, I just like to make 2 quick expectation/wish for phase 2 which are admin related

1. It's not really necessary to maintain a separate read-only channel for alternates. I think the same AC should be used by both alternate and members. Same applies with mailing list. Ofcourse when/if it gets to voting then members only have a vote. I don't think the idea of alternate in read only mode all through was helpful to the group nor the alternates themselves.

2. Having 3 hours or more remote call just doesn't sound cool....also alternating the call timing will be a good thing. Secondly 2 calls in a week may also be too much especially if one consider the fact that reps may still need to do calls with their SO/ACs within the week.

Regards

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, 20:13 Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi, <Hadia@tra.gov.eg> wrote:

Dear All,

 

If you wish please share your comments with regard to the objectives and expectations of phase 2 of the EPDP for gTLDs registration data.

 

Best

Hadia

 

From: CPWG [mailto:cpwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 10:33 AM
To: cpwg@icann.org
Subject: [CPWG] Fwd: [Gnso-epdp-team] Plan for Kobe meeting

 

Another important update for the EPDP process - phase 2.



-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:

[Gnso-epdp-team] Plan for Kobe meeting

Date:

Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:06:54 +0900

From:

Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>

To:

gnso-epdp-team@icann.org

 

Dear EPDP team,

 

As communicated previously, we are planning to have our F2F meetings in Kobe in order to prepare for phase 2. I will share ASAP a the guidance from GNSO Council for phase 2 and what is expected from EPDP team to come with for this period.

 

With regard to the questions asked in separate thread on membership confirmation/replacement, The EPDP team is tasked to develop a work plan, discuss what would be a reasonable pace of activity with accompanying working methods, review dependencies and their potential impact on the timeline, and identify what resources may be needed for phase 2. The proposed work plan, timeline and resources identified will need to be shared with the GNSO Council for its consideration. 

As part of this task, it will be helpful if members come prepared to Kobe with an idea of what commitment they are willing to make to phase 2 as that will facilitate the planning process.

 

Please find attached the draft agenda for our sessions in Kobe and also the mindmap on phase 2. We will have our sessions for the preparatory work  but also meetings with GDD regarding implementation, and the Technical Study Group to know more about their work and the impact on ours.

 

Please review the agenda and prepare for the meetings.

 

See you soon in Kobe, 神戸でじゃ、またね。

 

Best Regards,

 

Rafik

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg