Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0
At the last CPWG, I was asked to draft a statement on the Operational Design Phase Concept Paper (v2.0). The draft statement is now posted to the wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/qgNACQ) and is attached here for your convenience. The deadline for submission is Friday, 22 January 2021. Alan
Thanks Alan for the statement, I had a comment in relation to the flow chart on the last page of the concept paper. The flow chart indicates a direct path of communication between the GNSO council and the ODP team other than the GNSO Council Liaison/Liaisons to the ODP group. More clarification is required in relation to this other means of communication between the ODP team and the GNSO council and if you have some other direct means of communication between the council and the ODP team why do you need a Liaison? Hadia -----Original Message----- From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:45 PM To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0 At the last CPWG, I was asked to draft a statement on the Operational Design Phase Concept Paper (v2.0). The draft statement is now posted to the wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/qgNACQ) and is attached here for your convenience. The deadline for submission is Friday, 22 January 2021. Alan
My preference is to not add that for the following reasons: - it is indeed a valid question, but it is a result of the insertion of the GNSO Liaison into the equation, which is out main point of contention - and why the GNSO Council itself is even the focus. - I am a bit worried that they may address your point and ignore the main one - it is FAR easier to address than putting back some sort of DFG. Let's discuss further. Alan At 2021-01-19 12:01 PM, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi wrote:
Thanks Alan for the statement, I had a comment in relation to the flow chart on the last page of the concept paper. The flow chart indicates a direct path of communication between the GNSO council and the ODP team other than the GNSO Council Liaison/Liaisons to the ODP group. More clarification is required in relation to this other means of communication between the ODP team and the GNSO council and if you have some other direct means of communication between the council and the ODP team why do you need a Liaison?
Hadia
-----Original Message----- From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:45 PM To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0
At the last CPWG, I was asked to draft a statement on the Operational Design Phase Concept Paper (v2.0).
The draft statement is now posted to the wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/qgNACQ) and is attached here for your convenience.
The deadline for submission is Friday, 22 January 2021.
Alan
Hi Alan, I agree with your approach to the ALAC comment. The earlier proposed Design Feedback Group in the ODP concept paper v1, while seemingly bureaucratic in nature, did offer recognized opportunities for stakeholders outside those represented in the GNSO Council to intercede (where needed) in the manner ICANN Org takes issues of implementation planning to the ICANN Board. This is an important point. And I am also a little concerned with how the approach (to be) taken in this ODP paper v2 would ultimately set a precedent for considering implementation planning of policy recommendations coming down the line, such as those for RPMs and SubPro. Justine On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 01:49, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
My preference is to not add that for the following reasons:
- it is indeed a valid question, but it is a result of the insertion of the GNSO Liaison into the equation, which is out main point of contention - and why the GNSO Council itself is even the focus.
- I am a bit worried that they may address your point and ignore the main one - it is FAR easier to address than putting back some sort of DFG.
Let's discuss further.
Alan
At 2021-01-19 12:01 PM, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi wrote:
Thanks Alan for the statement, I had a comment in relation to the flow chart on the last page of the concept paper. The flow chart indicates a direct path of communication between the GNSO council and the ODP team other than the GNSO Council Liaison/Liaisons to the ODP group. More clarification is required in relation to this other means of communication between the ODP team and the GNSO council and if you have some other direct means of communication between the council and the ODP team why do you need a Liaison?
Hadia
-----Original Message----- From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:45 PM To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0
At the last CPWG, I was asked to draft a statement on the Operational Design Phase Concept Paper (v2.0).
The draft statement is now posted to the wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/qgNACQ) and is attached here for your convenience.
The deadline for submission is Friday, 22 January 2021.
Alan
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi -
Justine Chew