DRAFT COMMENT: Amendments to the Base gTLD RA and RAA
I suggested something short and sweet and there was general CPWG agreement. FIRST DRAFT: DNS Abuse has been discussed and debated within ICANN for what seems forever. Going back to 2010, a GNSO group (Registration Abuse Policies Implementation Drafting Team - RAP-‐IDT) identified issues and recommended actions be taken. Much talk, little action. We have repeatedly heard registrars say that compliance should take action against “bad actors” and ICANN Compliance saying that they did not have the tools. The ALAC has repeatedly, over many years, advised that that the obvious need was for registrars and ICANN Org to sit down and ensure that ICANN have the necessary tools. It is with collective pleasure that the ALAC compliments registrars and ICANN Org for finally doing just that. There are no doubt additional changes that the ALAC could identify to make the RAA/RA changes even better in our view, but this is not the time for that discussion. The ALAC supports the planned contractual improvements and encourages all parties to take whatever action necessary to ensure that they are implemented with minimal delay.
Thanks Alan Now if Staff could just include a workspace where people can provide comments - please Holly
On Jun 28, 2023, at 11:09 PM, Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
I suggested something short and sweet and there was general CPWG agreement.
FIRST DRAFT: DNS Abuse has been discussed and debated within ICANN for what seems forever. Going back to 2010, a GNSO group (Registration Abuse Policies Implementation Drafting Team - RAP-‐IDT) identified issues and recommended actions be taken.
Much talk, little action.
We have repeatedly heard registrars say that compliance should take action against “bad actors” and ICANN Compliance saying that they did not have the tools.
The ALAC has repeatedly, over many years, advised that that the obvious need was for registrars and ICANN Org to sit down and ensure that ICANN have the necessary tools.
It is with collective pleasure that the ALAC compliments registrars and ICANN Org for finally doing just that.
There are no doubt additional changes that the ALAC could identify to make the RAA/RA changes even better in our view, but this is not the time for that discussion.
The ALAC supports the planned contractual improvements and encourages all parties to take whatever action necessary to ensure that they are implemented with minimal delay.
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org <mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi all, The workspace is here, which includes link to a Google doc. Alan’s comments that were presented during today’s call, are in the comment section at the end of the page. When ready, the Google doc can be used for developing the draft statement. Best, Chantelle From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 12:39 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Subject: [Ext] Re: [CPWG] DRAFT COMMENT: Amendments to the Base gTLD RA and RAA Thanks Alan Now if Staff could just include a workspace where people can provide comments - please Holly On Jun 28, 2023, at 11:09 PM, Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: I suggested something short and sweet and there was general CPWG agreement. FIRST DRAFT: DNS Abuse has been discussed and debated within ICANN for what seems forever. Going back to 2010, a GNSO group (Registration Abuse Policies Implementation Drafting Team - RAP-‐IDT) identified issues and recommended actions be taken. Much talk, little action. We have repeatedly heard registrars say that compliance should take action against “bad actors” and ICANN Compliance saying that they did not have the tools. The ALAC has repeatedly, over many years, advised that that the obvious need was for registrars and ICANN Org to sit down and ensure that ICANN have the necessary tools. It is with collective pleasure that the ALAC compliments registrars and ICANN Org for finally doing just that. There are no doubt additional changes that the ALAC could identify to make the RAA/RA changes even better in our view, but this is not the time for that discussion. The ALAC supports the planned contractual improvements and encourages all parties to take whatever action necessary to ensure that they are implemented with minimal delay. _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
FYI with acknowledgemnt to Politico. CW ------------------------------------- HARDER, BETTER, FASTER GDPR: The European Commission will this morning present a law to bolster enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in major European privacy investigations targeting the likes of Google, Meta and Amazon. Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders will take to the press conference stage at 11 a.m. The problem (according to critics): Detractors say the current system is inefficient and slow, because the Irish and, to a lesser extent, the Luxembourgish privacy authorities direct major cases against Big Tech companies that have set up EU headquarters in their countries because of favorable tax regimes. The solution (according to the Commission): Today’s proposed regulation will set common rules to speed up complex cross-border probes, and force privacy regulators to better coordinate on major investigations. But activists are unlikely to be satisfied, as the EU executive will tread lightly with its changes, according to a draft of the regulation seen by Playbook and my colleague Clothilde Goujard (Cybersecurity and Data Protection and Technology Pros can read her curtain-raiser here <https://politico.us8.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e26c1a1c392386a968d02fdbc...>). Core untouched: “With our new proposal, we are [in] no way changing the core data protection rules, the rights of data subjects, or the roles of [data protection authorities] as enforcers,” Reynders said in a statement.
On 28 Jun 2023, at 21:42, Chantelle Doerksen via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
participants (4)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Chantelle Doerksen -
Holly Raiche -
lists＠christopherwilkinson.eu