IANA Intellectual Property Management Corporation topic
Dear Colleagues, on the last CPWG call, the question arose whether the IANA IPMC topic should be transferred to the Organisational, Finance and Budget Working Group (OFB-WG), now that the ALAC has sent its input to the IETF commenting process. The matter of whether the topic should be now transferred to the OFBWG - Operational Finance and Budget WG, is indeed topical. I would suggest that until we have an official public announcement that the IANA Intellectual Property Registration (IPR) has been successfully transferred to the IETF IPMC and the IETF IPMC running in a stable state, that is, has had its first post-transfer meeting and has announced officially that the transfer is complete, we keep an eye over this in the CPWG. Once this is done, it could be transferred over to the OFBWG as it is an IANA topic and that group is better suited to push for bylaw updates for the IETF IPMC than the Policy working group. Comments welcome. Kindest regards, Olivier
Totally agree, Olivier. Prudent to wit things to be stable… kisses Vanda From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Date: Monday, 12 January 2026 at 18:19 To: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] IANA Intellectual Property Management Corporation topic Dear Colleagues, on the last CPWG call, the question arose whether the IANA IPMC topic should be transferred to the Organisational, Finance and Budget Working Group (OFB-WG), now that the ALAC has sent its input to the IETF commenting process. The matter of whether the topic should be now transferred to the OFBWG - Operational Finance and Budget WG, is indeed topical. I would suggest that until we have an official public announcement that the IANA Intellectual Property Registration (IPR) has been successfully transferred to the IETF IPMC and the IETF IPMC running in a stable state, that is, has had its first post-transfer meeting and has announced officially that the transfer is complete, we keep an eye over this in the CPWG. Once this is done, it could be transferred over to the OFBWG as it is an IANA topic and that group is better suited to push for bylaw updates for the IETF IPMC than the Policy working group. Comments welcome. Kindest regards, Olivier
+1 Olivier. Does this have bearing on use of proprietary software? Quick Notes: In the early 2000s there were companies which relied on installing proprietary software on a user's computer or ISP network to redirect domain-name queries to non-ICANN-approved TLDs. Such efforts are a threat to universal resolvability and the stability of the global DNS. The core ICANN Internet Infrastructure Runs on FOSS. However, ICANN develops and retains intellectual property rights for some of its own platforms and software tools, such as the Domain Metrica Platform, which are accessed under specific terms of use. Third-party registry operators and registrars that contract with ICANN use a mixture of FOSS and proprietary systems. Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Retired Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering & Retired Director, Centre for Applied Research in Indic Technologies [CARIT] College of Engineering, Guindy Campus Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ________________________________ From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Sent: 13 January 2026 02:49 To: cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] IANA Intellectual Property Management Corporation topic Dear Colleagues, on the last CPWG call, the question arose whether the IANA IPMC topic should be transferred to the Organisational, Finance and Budget Working Group (OFB-WG), now that the ALAC has sent its input to the IETF commenting process. The matter of whether the topic should be now transferred to the OFBWG - Operational Finance and Budget WG, is indeed topical. I would suggest that until we have an official public announcement that the IANA Intellectual Property Registration (IPR) has been successfully transferred to the IETF IPMC and the IETF IPMC running in a stable state, that is, has had its first post-transfer meeting and has announced officially that the transfer is complete, we keep an eye over this in the CPWG. Once this is done, it could be transferred over to the OFBWG as it is an IANA topic and that group is better suited to push for bylaw updates for the IETF IPMC than the Policy working group. Comments welcome. Kindest regards, Olivier
Dear Gopal, thanks for your follow-up. The IANA IPR transfer process does not have any bearing on the use of proprietary software. However, there are other discussions at the IETF itself, which discuss Intellectual Property issues in the wider context of RFCs. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipr/about/ The RFC work is essentially finished, but the mailing list which supports the RFC work on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipr-wg/ still has occasional postings and discussions. None of this is directly relevant to ICANN or At-Large. Kindest regards, Olivier On 13/01/2026 02:15, gopal wrote:
+1 Olivier.
Does this have bearing on use of proprietary software?
Quick Notes:
In the early 2000s there were companies which relied on installing proprietary software on a user's computer or ISP network to redirect domain-name queries to non-ICANN-approved TLDs.
Such efforts are a threat to universal resolvability and the stability of the global DNS. The core ICANN Internet Infrastructure Runs on FOSS.
However, ICANN develops and retains intellectual property rights for some of its own platforms and software tools, such as the Domain Metrica Platform, which are accessed under specific terms of use.
Third-party registry operators and registrars that contract with ICANN use a mixture of FOSS and proprietary systems.
Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 <https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545> https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli <https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Retired Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering & Retired Director, Centre for Applied Research in Indic Technologies [CARIT] College of Engineering, Guindy Campus Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> *Sent:* 13 January 2026 02:49 *To:* cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org> *Subject:* [CPWG] IANA Intellectual Property Management Corporation topic Dear Colleagues,
on the last CPWG call, the question arose whether the IANA IPMC topic should be transferred to the Organisational, Finance and Budget Working Group (OFB-WG), now that the ALAC has sent its input to the IETF commenting process.
The matter of whether the topic should be now transferred to the OFBWG - Operational Finance and Budget WG, is indeed topical.
I would suggest that until we have an official public announcement that the IANA Intellectual Property Registration (IPR) has been successfully transferred to the IETF IPMC and the IETF IPMC running in a stable state, that is, has had its first post-transfer meeting and has announced officially that the transfer is complete, we keep an eye over this in the CPWG. Once this is done, it could be transferred over to the OFBWG as it is an IANA topic and that group is better suited to push for bylaw updates for the IETF IPMC than the Policy working group.
Comments welcome.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
I agree with regard to the timing of moving this work from CPWG to the OFB-WG. Let's wait for "steady state" to occur, and we can push the process along (with appropriate oversight). Greg *____________________* *Greg Shatan* *Chair, NARALO* gregshatanalac@gmail.com On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 6:13 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG < cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Gopal,
thanks for your follow-up. The IANA IPR transfer process does not have any bearing on the use of proprietary software.
However, there are other discussions at the IETF itself, which discuss Intellectual Property issues in the wider context of RFCs.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipr/about/
The RFC work is essentially finished, but the mailing list which supports the RFC work on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipr-wg/ still has occasional postings and discussions. None of this is directly relevant to ICANN or At-Large.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 13/01/2026 02:15, gopal wrote:
+1 Olivier.
Does this have bearing on use of proprietary software?
Quick Notes:
In the early 2000s there were companies which relied on installing proprietary software on a user's computer or ISP network to redirect domain-name queries to non-ICANN-approved TLDs.
Such efforts are a threat to universal resolvability and the stability of the global DNS. The core ICANN Internet Infrastructure Runs on FOSS.
However, ICANN develops and retains intellectual property rights for some of its own platforms and software tools, such as the Domain Metrica Platform, which are accessed under specific terms of use.
Third-party registry operators and registrars that contract with ICANN use a mixture of FOSS and proprietary systems.
Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Retired Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering & Retired Director, Centre for Applied Research in Indic Technologies [CARIT] College of Engineering, Guindy Campus Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------ *From:* Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> *Sent:* 13 January 2026 02:49 *To:* cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> *Subject:* [CPWG] IANA Intellectual Property Management Corporation topic
Dear Colleagues,
on the last CPWG call, the question arose whether the IANA IPMC topic should be transferred to the Organisational, Finance and Budget Working Group (OFB-WG), now that the ALAC has sent its input to the IETF commenting process.
The matter of whether the topic should be now transferred to the OFBWG - Operational Finance and Budget WG, is indeed topical.
I would suggest that until we have an official public announcement that the IANA Intellectual Property Registration (IPR) has been successfully transferred to the IETF IPMC and the IETF IPMC running in a stable state, that is, has had its first post-transfer meeting and has announced officially that the transfer is complete, we keep an eye over this in the CPWG. Once this is done, it could be transferred over to the OFBWG as it is an IANA topic and that group is better suited to push for bylaw updates for the IETF IPMC than the Policy working group.
Comments welcome.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (4)
-
gopal -
Greg Shatan [NARALO] -
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond -
Vanda Scartezini