Minor changes to EPDP Board replies
Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC. 1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error. 2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing "Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." to "The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated. Alan
I support these changes. Greg On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:56 AM Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC.
1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error.
2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing
"Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
to
"The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated.
Alan_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Dr. Alan Greenberg, Your edits are fine with me. It has been my pleasure interacting with you as the work on this document progressed. As you would appreciate, these efforts stand justified when the clear thinking of the stakeholders becomes visible. Sincerely, Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 2022-01-10 22:02, Alan Greenberg via CPWG wrote:
Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC.
1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error.
2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing
"Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
to
"The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated.
Alan _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I would just note that “proscriptive” was not an error in the statement. We meant to say that the ALAC does not want to forbid the board from taking a certain action. Proscriptive has a different meaning than prescriptive and was intentionally put that is it is not a mistake. However, the statement is also open to any change in content the message delivered, no restrictions. Hadia Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Jan 2022, at 7:56 AM, gopal--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Dr. Alan Greenberg,
Your edits are fine with me.
It has been my pleasure interacting with you as the work on this document progressed.
As you would appreciate, these efforts stand justified when the clear thinking of the stakeholders becomes visible.
Sincerely,
Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 2022-01-10 22:02, Alan Greenberg via CPWG wrote: Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC. 1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error. 2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing "Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." to "The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated. Alan _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I did consider that, but "proscriptive" means we are not going to (try to) forbid some actions, while "prescriptive" has a wider meaning of not attempting to limit what the do or not do, subject to our advice. Alan At 2022-01-11 04:37 AM, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi wrote:
I would just note that â?oproscriptiveâ? was not an error in the statement. We meant to say that the ALAC does not want to forbid the board from taking a certain action. Proscriptive has a different meaning than prescriptive and was intentionally put that is it is not a mistake. However, the statement is also open to any change in content the message delivered, no restrictions.
Hadia
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Jan 2022, at 7:56 AM, gopal--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Dr. Alan Greenberg,
Your edits are fine with me.
It has been my pleasure interacting with you as the work on this document progressed.
As you would appreciate, these efforts stand justified when the clear thinking of the stakeholders becomes visible.
Sincerely,
Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 2022-01-10 22:02, Alan Greenberg via CPWG wrote: Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC. 1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error. 2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing "Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." to "The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council." Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated. Alan _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Fine for me! Thanks Holly and Alan! Best, M. __________________________ Ing. Mag. Matthias M. Hudobnik FIP, CIPP/E, CIPT, DPO, CIS LA matthias@hudobnik.at http://www.hudobnik.at @mhudobnik
On 10.01.2022, at 17:57, Alan Greenberg via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Holly identified two problems with the Replies currently before the ALAC.
1. In the first paragraph of the reply to Question 1, the word "proscriptive" was used instead of "prescriptive". I have corrected this error.
2. In the 2nd sentence of the reply to Question 3, Holly commented that the meaning of the sentence was not clear. I have simplified it changing
"Ultimately the adopted Directive will need to factor in the input the various EU bodies are receiving as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
to
"The Directive eventually adopted by the EU will need to factor comments received as well as being the result of negotiations between the EU Parliament and Council."
Neither of these changes alters the intent and meaning of the responses and I suggest that they be incorporated.
Alan
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (5)
-
Alan Greenberg -
gopal＠annauniv.edu -
Greg Shatan [ALAC] -
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi -
Matthias M. Hudobnik