I wouldn’t focus on who the investors are — this is a very US-centric “pitch” to get signatures on the petition. We don’t need to get caught up in US partisan politics. Instead, focus on what the investors are not — they are not “impact investors,” “Zebra investors,” “green investors” or any other term that would describe investors and investment companies who value conscience over capital, who value doing right by the world over doing well for themselves, who value the global net effect of their investments over the “X” multiple they get when they implement their exit strategy. There are investors, private equity firms and venture capital firms like this. They do exist. Ethos Capital could be read as saying that they are one of them. If they had a track record, one might even believe them. Without that, it’s entirely fair to judge a new fund on the identity of its investors. A fund needs to decide what kind of investors it will target. Meanwhile investors are looking for funds that are aligned with their goals. We don’t know the the Ethos pitch that attracted these investors. And we don’t know what chord that struck in these investors’ hearts. Maybe they all became big marshmallows full of love for non-profits and responsible management of a TLD aimed at the non-profit community. Maybe they decided that they didn’t need this chunk of money to “work hard” to maximize profits — that their other investments were big and bad enough to cover their financial targets. Maybe they all became “impact investors” for one transaction. But I wouldn’t bet on it. Instead, it appears like one more reason not to like this deal — even if some deal, and some investors would have been acceptable or even inspiring. Imagine that the investors were huge non-profit foundations, already imbued with a mission aligned with the mission of .org. What if the list of signatories on the savedotorg.org letter was instead the list of investors? That would at least put a different spin on things. Best regards, Greg On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:45 PM Kaili Kan <kankaili@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, Dev,

Thank you for the info. However, does this article's title mean the Republic Party of the USA? Although it is good to know about the .org deal's investors, but it seems like this article is aimed at USA's domestic politics, and I am not sure if we want to be related to it.

Best, Kaili

On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 2:27 AM Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:

...

As a FYI, Here’s another bit of news regarding the three other US investors in addition to Ethos Capital in .org : * Perot Holdings (affiliated with Petrus Asset Management Co/Petrus Holding Co) * FMR LLC (affiliated with Johnson family) * Solamere Capital (affiliated with Romney)

https://medium.com/@jacobmalthouse/whos-going-to-run-org-in-a-word-the-gop-8...

Dev Anand _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on._______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg

Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-- Greg Shatan greg@isoc-ny.org President, ISOC-NY *"The Internet is for everyone"*