Hi Donna,

The CSC Charter review showed that impact of the proposed changes and distinction between Final Report and amended charter were unclear. Ensuring timely and structured involvement mitigates interpretation and/or implementation risks in phase when RT is no longer around.

Hope this clarifies the need.

Kind regards,

Bart

From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@team.neustar>
Date: Monday 15 October 2018 at 14:48
To: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Cc: "CSC-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <CSC-effectivenessrt@icann.org>, Amy Creamer <amy.creamer@icann.org>, Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Straw man presentation

Bart, why do we need liaisons from ICANN .org and PTI? 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 12, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Please find included the intitial draft for the RT presentations in Barcelona.

I have drafted it on the basis of Phillipe’s example, the template document and using latest version of Debbie’s document.

Please note that:

CSC has appointed Elain Pruis as its liaison and PTI has appointed Kim Davies as its liaison. We are awaiting appointment of the ICANN Org liaison. For the time being I have included Trang and Amy Creamer in cc.

Kind regards,

Bart

<CSC Effectiveness Review Presentation.pptx>

_______________________________________________
CSC-EffectivenessRT mailing list
CSC-EffectivenessRT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-effectivenessrt