Dear all,

As a friendly reminder, I’m attaching the template document Bart circulated last week. Please let us know if you have any comments.

Would you like to schedule an additional call?

The next CSC meeting is scheduled for 17 September at 20:00 UTC. As discussed on last week’s call, we’ve included an agenda item for this team to meet with the CSC.

Lastly, when would you like to schedule the Effectiveness Review Team public session in Barcelona? May I suggest Monday, 22 October block 13:30-15:00? Please let me know if that works for you.

Best,

Ria

From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM
To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review

Dear all,

Please find included redline and clean version of template document.

In addition to Philippe’s suggested changes, I have:

Included sentence to mandate the RT to develop relevant performance indicators and use relevant metrics, reflecting the CSC Effectivenss measures as listed by martin and you have accepted

Updated section 9 about process/procedure to reflect yesterday’s discussion

Updated the schedule per yesterday’s discussion

Kind regards,

Bart

From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>
Date: Tuesday 28 August 2018 at 16:10
To: Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org>, "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review

Hi everyone,

Following our discussion earlier today, I made a quick revision of the attached. Editorial changes I’d say:

• Have attempted to include Debbie’s suggestion on section 6 to remove “possible”.
• We need to make sure that under 10 the number of [public] sessions matches our discussion

Regarding the point of how CSC may review the KPIs and metrics moving forward, I believe this falls under 3.C.i ,  but tend to think this belongs to the review itself rather than to the methodology so I didn’t change the text. I’d suggest we keep this for the review itself.

Regards,

Philippe

From: CSC-EffectivenessRT [mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Maria Otanes
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:52 PM
To: csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org
Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Draft Template CSC Effectiveness Review

Dear Effectiveness Review Team,

Please find the draft template CSC Effectiveness Review document.

It can also be found on the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/JRRpBQ

All the best,

Ria

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Ria Otanes

Secretariat Operations Coordinator

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Telephone: +1 202 249 7540

Mobile: +1 202 679 5185

Skype: maria.otanes.icann

Washington, DC Office | UTC-4

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.