All
Sorry for the delay—these things always take longer than you hope.
I felt that the report was overly long, so I’m suggesting that we delete a lot of the background stuff related to the CSC Charter Review. We note that this was a reference document for our work and that it formed a baseline, so I don’t think we need to go too much into chapter and verse on that, but I appreciate that others may have different opinions.
I’ve added one more recommendation: that an induction program be developed for new members and liaisons.
Clean and redline versions attached.
Thanks
Donna
Dera all,
Please find include a clean version of the Initial report and redline and clean version of the matrix.
The latest version of the matrix is now included in the report
I have also included your comments from yesterday in the report.
Kind regards,
Bart
Phillipe, All
CSC appointees must attend a minimum of nine meetings in a one – year period, and must not be absent for more than two consecutive meetings. Failure to meet this requirement may result in the Chair of the CSC requesting a replacement from the respective organisation.
Updated Timeline
Publish Initial reprot for public comment: 14 January
Closure public comment: 24 February
Prep Final Report + staff summary week 25-1 March
Submit final report: 4 March
Kind regards,
Bart
Dear Philippe, All,
Per the IPR agreements, “IANA” cannot be used on a stand-alone basis. Accordingly, I’ve made a small edit to the first row of the matrix to fix this issue.
Best,
Trang
Dear RT,
Hope you’re all well. Attached, a few editorial changes that may be worthwhile making on the matrix. Regarding attendance, I couldn’t track down where the “minimum of nine meetings” came from for reference.
The Conclusions and recommendations section of the draft report looks good to me.
Best Wishes for the New Year.
Philippe
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
Happy 2019 and welcome back from the holidays.
As a friendly reminder, we have our next call scheduled for this Wednesday, 09 January at 18:00 UTC.
The updated matrix is attached for your review and for comments/feedback.
Talk you soon,
Ria
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
I sent a calendar invite for Wednesday, 09 January at 18:00 UTC for the next ERT call.
I’m attaching the updated matrix Bart circulated yesterday.
Hope you all have a wonderful holidays!
All the best,
Ria
Dear all,
Please find included the (hopefully) final version of the Assessment Matrix.
Per conversastion yesterday;
ITEM 4 remained as is, with a small editorial change: Either use Service Level (SL) or Service Level Agrrement (SLA). Suggestion is to use SL, or SLs.
Kind regards,
Bart
Hi Martin
A couple of minor changes on top of yours.
Donna
Hi all,
Sorry to be late: a few questions and a couple of corrections from me in the attached.
Best
Martin
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
Please find the informal notes from the last call attached. Also attached the revised matrix again.
Please complete the Doodle poll below to schedule a call for next week.
Best,
Ria
Dear Effectiveness Review Team,
Please find the revised matrix attached.
It’s also included in the google doc with the Initial Report, starting on page 7.
Best,
Ria
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.