Dear Olga,
I cannot be on the call because i will be traveling today, so here is the background to the conversations with the ALAC and LACRALO leadership, who kindly have been looking for new volunteers for the CWG-UCTN because only Cheryl has been participant from their side.
I gave some background on the working group, particularly that it developed from a previous working group by the ccNSO, that there existed another working group on geographic names in the GAC
that the objectives of both the CWG and the GAC group where still based on different assumptions, as GAC had chosen a much wider scope
I may have also mentioned the letter of the GNASO and ccNSO Chairs wrote to the Chair of the GAC after the Buenos Aires meeting where little if any progress was made in trying to work together.
Best regards
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez_____________________email: crg@isoc-cr.orgSkype: carlos.raulg+506 8837 7173 (cel)+506 4000 2000 (home)+506 2290 3678 (fax)_____________________Apartado 1571-1000San Jose, COSTA RICA
Dear Bart,
many thanks for the agenda.
There is an email sent by one of the co-chairs of this CCWG to the Regional At Large LACRALO email list with comments about the role of the GAC.
I would like to request clarification about what is stated in that email and make comments about it.
Best regards
Olga
_______________________________________________
Ctn-crosscom mailing list
Ctn-crosscom@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom