Hi,

Yes: it must be obviously “three-letter” in the mid of page 1

(“The CWG has interpreted this as comprising:…….. “).

I do miss the “short forms” of country and territory names – as

the 2012 AGB 2.2.1.4.1  is mentioning them.

I like the final recommendation – but urge to make sure that nobody

could misinterpret it in a way that “no policy can ever be created

allowing country names & ISO 3166 II codes to be delegated”. THIS WG

was unable to find a solution – other policy making groups have to

take over (gNSO).

Thanks,

Alexander

From: ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org

[mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Joke Braeken

Sent: Dienstag, 30. August 2016 16:48

To: ctn-crosscom@icann.org

Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions

related to the post-Helsinki progress report

Dear all,

As discussed during the latest call on 29 August @21UTC, you are

kindly invited to submit comments or questions related to the

post-Helsinki progress report.  Please find the latest version in

attachment.

Discussion on the list is more than welcome, but please make changes

related to the progress report in the report itself.

Deadline: Monday 13 September, end of day.

Best regards,

Joke Braeken

ccNSO Policy Advisor

  <mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> joke.braeken@icann.org

Follow @ccNSO on Twitter:  <https://twitter.com/ccNSO>

https://twitter.com/ccNSO

Follow the ccNSO on Facebook:  <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/>

https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/

  <http://ccnso.icann.org> http://ccnso.icann.org

_______________________________________________

Ctn-crosscom mailing list

Ctn-crosscom@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom