Dear all,


I have followed up in answering Annebeth's questions in the comments  and have no fundamental objections. On one point I believe we have duplicate text in two places so we need to decide where to put it. I've noted that in a reply comment. New version attached.


I do not agree with Timo's proposal at the end of the document to remove the reference in the recommendations section to the charter of the Subsequent Procedures PDP. This should not be a controversial statement, as the Charter is available and a public document.


Kind regards,


Heather Forrest

From: ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange@uninett.no>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:53:10 PM
To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.; Alexander Schubert
Cc: ctn-crosscom@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report
 
Good point, Alexander. I have added a few more things in the paper to meet your comment here.

Med vennlig hilsen
Annebeth


From: <ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg@isoc-cr.org>
Date: Tuesday 30 August 2016 17:14
To: Alexander Schubert <alexander@schubert.berlin>
Cc: "ctn-crosscom@icann.org" <ctn-crosscom@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions related to the post-Helsinki progress report

Thanks Alex

will go over it


Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 30 Aug 2016, at 16:50, Alexander Schubert wrote:

Hi,



Yes: it must be obviously “three-letter” in the mid of page 1
(“The CWG has interpreted this as comprising:…….. “).



I do miss the “short forms” of country and territory names – as
the 2012 AGB 2.2.1.4.1  is mentioning them.

I like the final recommendation – but urge to make sure that nobody
could misinterpret it in a way that “no policy can ever be created
allowing country names & ISO 3166 II codes to be delegated”. THIS WG
was unable to find a solution – other policy making groups have to
take over (gNSO).



Thanks,



Alexander





[mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Joke Braeken
Sent: Dienstag, 30. August 2016 16:48
Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] invitation to submit comments or questions
related to the post-Helsinki progress report



Dear all,



As discussed during the latest call on 29 August @21UTC, you are
kindly invited to submit comments or questions related to the
post-Helsinki progress report.  Please find the latest version in
attachment.

Discussion on the list is more than welcome, but please make changes
related to the progress report in the report itself.



Deadline: Monday 13 September, end of day.



Best regards,





Joke Braeken

ccNSO Policy Advisor




Follow @ccNSO on Twitter:  <https://twitter.com/ccNSO>

Follow the ccNSO on Facebook:  <https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/>




_______________________________________________
Ctn-crosscom mailing list
_______________________________________________
Ctn-crosscom mailing list
Ctn-crosscom@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom