Dear all,
I share Annebeth’s concerns.
-
The clear distinction between ccTLDs and gTLDs, based on TLD length, is lost, once opening up 2-letters as gTLDs. This will increase the end-user confusion.
After all, the legal frameworks governing ccTLDs and gTLDs are different.
-
having a 2-character gTLD assigned, which might correspond to the 2-letter code of a potential future country, will disadvantage said country
Best regards.
Joke Braeken (Ms)
External Relations Deputy Manager
EURid
Woluwelaan 150
1831 Diegem - Belgium
TEL.: +32 (0) 2 401 27 50
DIRECT: +32 (0) 2 401 30 14
MOB.:+32 (0) 473 779 559
From: ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Annebeth Lange
Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 10:03
To: Jordi Iparraguirre; ctn-crosscom@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] Next meeting
Hi all,
Thanks for all the comments. I have added another argument under option 3 to hightlight the risks opening up for 2-letters for gTLDs. I understand that these
brand owners would like to have their brand as domain name, but in my view this will ruin the system with the distinction between ccTLDs and gTLDs and discriminate possible new countries in the future.
Kind regards,
Annebeth
Annebeth B. Lange
Head of Legal and Policy
UNINETT Norid AS
C. J. Hambros plass 2 c
NO-0164 OSLO
Mobile: +47 959 11 559
From:
"Jordi Iparraguirre .cat" <jordi@iparraguirre.cat>
Date: Tuesday 2 June 2015 09:44
To: "ctn-crosscom@icann.org" <ctn-crosscom@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ctn-crosscom] Next meeting
Hi and apologies for not being able to join the last conference.
Option 3 is an interesting one. I've added a couple of risks to it as I
think there is a risk of consumer confusion and brand overlapping.
Attached previous (Grigori+Colin) doc + my edits.
Thanks
jordi
El 01/06/15 a les 21:04, Colin O'Brien ha escrit:
Hello all,
I have added an additional option to Grigori’s document. I feel there
should be an option that allows the owners of 2 character trademarks to
operate closed brand registries as long as there is no conflict with ISO
3166-1.
Cordially,
Colin
[mailto:ctn-crosscom-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lars Hoffmann
*Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:36 AM
*To:* ctn-crosscom@icann.org
*Subject:* [Ctn-crosscom] Next meeting
Dear all,
Apologies for the late email, but due to a number of scheduling issues
we will cancel next week’s call. Instead we will resume our calls on
Monday 8 June at 20:00 UTC (local times
A detailed agenda will follow.
This also means, that there will be more time for participants to send
back their views on the 2-letter code options. I have attached all
documents received so far. In time for the next meeting I will send out
a collated document.
Please note, if you send a document please feel free to post directly to
the list, I will collate it from there.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Ctn-crosscom mailing list