Apologies to those who receive this email twice. I assume all names are on the group list but not 100% sure.
Apologies too for not being able to spend time on this sooner.
A couple of additional points from me.
1. I note that the Charter Template abbreviates the term "Cross Community Working Group" to "CWG", but in our text, we are calling it "ccWG". I suggest that we standardise on one or the other,
not sure which. In my amendments, I have continued using "ccWG" in the text.
2. I have done a few suggested formatting changes aiming to improve the flow and readability of the document.
3. I have added words to try to pick up on Avri's point about the Charter not precluding comment on IANA Functions 1 and 10 should the ccWG deem that appropriate.
4. In the section titled 'Deliverables', I have tentatively added another step at No3:
"Development of a clear process and timeline for communicating the Community proposal to participating
chartering organizations and obtaining their endorsement"
However, I say tentatively because I'm not sure whether this is the appropriate.
Updated document attached.
Cheers, Julie