Is this intended to replace the entire paragraph or some part of it?
Chuck
From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Grace Abuhamad
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Allan MacGillivray; Julie Hammer; CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter for review
Hi Allan, all,
After consultation with staff, we'd like to suggest a more generic phrasing of "ICANN
will provide sufficient staff support to support the activities of the CWG." This
allows for shifting if necessary.
As you noted, I put a placeholder in the draft charter for the resourcing text, but I misunderstood the place for the request. I will remove that placeholder
in the next redline.
Thank you,
Grace
From:
Allan MacGillivray <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca>
Date: Monday, August 11, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Julie Hammer <julie.hammer@bigpond.com>, "CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org" <CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter for review
Hi everyone – I said that I would draft some words on resourcing. My sense from the call was that the text of the charter is not the place to
make the actual request, but rather that Jonathan and Byron would do this by letter. With this understanding, I propose the following words:
The chairs of this charter’s drafting team, Jonathan Robinson and Byron Holland, will write to ICANN seeking reasonable travel
resources for CWG members to participate in face-to-face CWG meetings, but on the understanding that the CWG will make every effort to hold any face-to-face meetings concurrent, or in conjunction with regularly scheduled ICANN meetings.
Grace – the text on staff assignments in the resourcing section also needs to be completed. In an effort to get a final draft by Wednesday, could
you help me get some language in here. I don’t know if staff members are to be identified by name or whether more generic language is commonly used e.g. a minimum of x number of staff resources. Could suggest something?
Thanks
Allan
From:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Julie Hammer
Sent: August-11-14 10:09 AM
To: CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter for review
Hi Everyone,
I propose that the first sentence in the section titled 'Goals and Objectives' be amended to read:
The primary goal of the Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal (CWG) will be to produce a consolidated transition
proposal for the elements of the IANA Functions relating to the Domain Name System. That proposal may include options for specific features within it, provided that each option carries the same level of consensus from the CWG.
Cheers, Julie
On 11 Aug 2014, at 6:44 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks Marika and CWG Colleagues,
The agenda below is the one I expect we will now follow.
As proposed a little over a week ago and also below, I think the realistic way to work through the charter in the time allocated for the call is
to seek objections to / concerns with the current wording.
To the extent that members are OK with the wording, we’ll take that as read.
Many thanks to those who have contributed to getting this in such good shape over a relatively short time,
Talk with you all at 13h00 UTC.
Jonathan
From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: 08 August 2014 12:22
To: CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda and latest version of charter for review
Dear All,
Please find below the proposed agenda for Monday's DT meeting, subject to revisions by the co-chairs and input from the DT. Having discussed this
with Jonathan, we would like to encourage you to identify any other items beyond those listed in agenda item 2 that in your view need to be further discussed by the DT – we will operate under the assumption that apart from those items already identified and
additional items that may get flagged prior to the meeting, the current language / proposed edits as in the latest version of the charter as attached are acceptable by all and do not need further discussion.
Please note that in the attached version (based on the version that Julie sent earlier today), I've added some proposed wording to the 'additional
resources required' section to highlight that this is something the CWG should preferably focus on at an early stage as it is unlikely that the DT at this point in time will be in a position to identify what additional resources the CWG may need.
If you have any comments and/or questions, please share those with the list.
Best regards,
Marika
Proposed Agenda – DT Meeting – Monday 11 August at 13.00 UTC
_______________________________________________
CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship