Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active.
Dear all,
Being unable to attend Monday’s
call, I provide you hereafter with my remarks on the Charter’s last
version/
·
The “Scope”
part was modified according to our last call’s discussion, but the “Problem
Statement” and “Goals and Objectives” ones still present the
CWG as a joint ccNSO-GNSO WG on the stewardship transition of IANA function
related to naming services only.
·
Deliverables concerns substance, not process. The content
of the “Deliverables” section should be under another section
called “working methods” for example, while We should say what this
CWG has to produce as substance (report about a transition plan, …) with
full details in the “deliverable” section
·
The definition
of the consensus level should be in my opinion:
o Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees;
identified by an absence of objection
o Consensus – a position where a small minority disagrees,
but most agree
In the
absence of full consensus, the chairs should ….
I would like to thank all those who proposed
the modifications, especially Avri who captured very well the content of the
discussion of last call.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean
Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: + 216 41 649 605
Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
Fax: + 216 70 853 376
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Message d'origine-----
De : cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Grace Abuhamad
Envoyé : samedi 26 juillet 2014 00:25
À : Allan MacGillivray; Marika Konings; Avri Doria;
cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org
Objet : Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review - latest version of
charter & notes from meeting
Hi all,
Attached are two latest versions of the charter. I
removed Allan's notes as he requested. One version has redlined changes, the
other is clean with just comments.
Talk to you all on Monday,
Grace
On 7/24/14 3:49 PM, "Allan MacGillivray"
<allan.macgillivray@cira.ca>
wrote:
>At the IETF BoF meeting this morning in Toronto, the
IETF agreed to
>establish a working group on IANA transition. Alissa
Cooper made a
>presentation (available at
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-ianaplan-1.pptx
)
>which contains (page 11) a revised timeline for the
ICG's work. While
>it remains even 'draftier' than their charter, it
nevertheless reflects
>some discussion that the ICG has apparently had since
their meeting last week.
> You will note that in this timeline, they are no
longer seeking a
>submission from each community by the end of the
year, but rather by
>Feb. 2, just before ICANN Marrakech. But the end
date has been moved
>to June to reflect the likelihood that the NTIA will
have to run its
>own domestic consultation process, which would likely
include some form
>of US Congressional scrutiny.
>
>Marika - could I ask you to remove the notes from me
in the next
>version of the draft charter?
>
>Thanks
>
>Allan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org
>[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On
Behalf Of Marika
>Konings
>Sent: July-24-14 6:47 AM
>To: Avri Doria; cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org
>Subject: Re: [CWG-DT-Stewardship] For your review -
latest version of
>charter & notes from meeting
>
>As the document still came up with the Academy WG
name, I've taken the
>liberty to re-save the document under its original
title, removed the
>comments that Chuck said could be removed and deleted
the sentence 'and
>sub-working groups' to avoid any confusion over
whether additional
>members would need to be appointed to sub-working
groups. Please use
>this version to make any further comments / edits.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>On 22/07/14 16:41, "Avri Doria"
<avri@acm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>On 22-Jul-14 09:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that
you may have been
>>> working on the Academy WG around the same
time. :)
>>
>>actually just fumble fingering where i do a 'save
as' and accidentally
>>press the wrong name. the academy Wg file is
from 2012.
>>
>>i have attached a copy with the correct file
name, just for filing sake.
>>
>>thanks for noticing.
>>
>>avri
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All good contributions Avri.
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>>
>>> I really like Avri's suggestion on the
linkage between the
>>> Accountability effort and the IANA
transition; see comment Ad10R9 on
>>> page 3.
>>>
>>> I think she raises a very important question
in comment Ad18R17 on
>>> page 4 :" Why would subgroups have
different membership?"
>>>
>>> I definitely think "we should avoid
voting" as she says in comment
>>> Ad26R25 on page 5.
>>>
>>> On a different note, I suggest deleting the
following comments from
>>> me: CG1 and CG16.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> Avri - Your name for the file indicates that
you may have been
>>> working on the Academy WG around the same
time. :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From:
>>> cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org
>>>
[mailto:cwg-dt-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri
>>> Doria
>>> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 11:28 PM To:
>>> cwg-dt-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re:
[CWG-DT-Stewardship] For
>>> your review - latest version of charter
& notes from meeting
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have added a few more comments.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-DT-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-DT-Stewardship@icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-dt-stewardship
|
|
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active. |