-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for
Wednesday December 3rd
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, December 03, 2014 3:44 pm
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
Cc: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org>
We probably do have better things to discuss.... :-)On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:Hello all,
On 03/12/2014 22:10, Greg Shatan wrote:
> The objection was made only to releasing those "captured" comments in
> a "daily log" format, out of concern we would give inappropriate
> weight to these early comments versus comments that come later in the
> process.
I really do not know why we are fussing about this. Seriously?
I find Bernard Turcotte's daily summary helpful and I will give weight
to early or late comments as I wish. As for the group itself giving
equal weight to all comments, this is a given. That's how all public
comments are analysed in ICANN. Thanks Bernard!
Regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship