Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in. Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to look at all comments after they all come in.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

All,

This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in keeping track of the various postings.

Comments on how to improve this welcome.

B.,

For December 2nd we have the following:

Date	From	Summary
20141202	Page Howe	Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained.
20141202	Graham Schreiber	Garbled paste into body of comment
20141202	Graham Schreiber	Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed until this is resolved.

A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached.