You’re right, Seun!

My mistake, thanks for catching it

 

From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Milton L Mueller
Cc: Alan Greenberg; Greg Shatan; cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] The PTI board

 

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:

 The PRF escalation path should go through the PTI board, for example.

 

 

Perhaps you meant the CSC and not the PRF as i think PRF (ICANN) is the entity awarding contract to PTI hence PTI is subject to PRF as the contractor. So if there is any escalation to be done as it concerns IANA operations in relations to names, it has to be CSC escalating to PTI.

So PTI will sure need some level of MS. IANA issue escalation that may get to PRF will be those that have been independently filed due to gross miss-conduct/non-performance from PTI as the IANA manager.

 

Regards

 


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship




--

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web:     
http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

The key to understanding is humility - my view !