I agree with James and Jonathan, both in process and result, as well as consequences.  In any event, this doesn't conflict with the work of the CCWG, so I so no reason to backtrack (and possible further consequences to the work of the CCWG if we were to do so).

Greg

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:18 AM, James Gannon <james@cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
I belive that we came to the requirement, the wording associated with it, and the method of implementation of that and that the chartering organisations agreed to it in our proposal.
If we try and go back on this now it opens up a whole can of worms that we in my opinion can’t go into unless its an absolute necessity.

-James

From: <cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson
Organization: Afilias
Reply-To: "jrobinson@afilias.info"
Date: Friday 25 September 2015 17:11
To: 'Seun Ojedeji'

Cc: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org"
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal work for CCWG Accountability on Board Proposals versus CCWG Proposals

Thanks Seun,

 

Any other view on this?

 

Notwithstanding the views, a key point for me is that we ended up where we did, then put it to public comment, then put it to the chartering organisations.

 

Therefore, it seems to me that (assuming we wanted to) it would be challenging to unwind a requirement such as this one at this stage. At least in a timely way.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 September 2015 15:43
To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Legal work for CCWG Accountability on Board Proposals versus CCWG Proposals

 

Thanks Jonathan, reading through the CWG dependency I was really wondering whether it was appropriate for us to have required a veto on ICANN budget instead of that of the PTI/IANA because I think they are 2 different things.

Perhaps our choice of words like approval/veto is a concern as well.

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.

All,

 

You may find the attached to be useful background reading in relation to the CWGs consideration of its dependencies on the CCWG work.

 

Thank-you.

 

 

Jonathan


_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship