Hi,
If there is the understanding of the 2 points below:
- That there is supposed to be another process that handles the relationship between NTIA & the root zone maintainer (which is not within the scope of CWG)
- That the relationship between NTIA & IANA is what the CWG is supposed to look into transitioning (which is what most DTs is expected to address)
Then I don't think there would be need for DT-F
I hope we are not fragmenting these DTs beyond defragmentation.
Regards
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
Dear all,On our last call, on Thursday, we noted an action to make a call for a DT-F lead. This DT is listed as a Priority 1 DT, so we would like to identify a lead and a working group as soon as possible.As a reminder, here is an excerpt about DT-F from the Status document on the Wiki:
Relationship between the NTIA, IANA and the Root Zone Maintainer
Lead
TBC
Status
Step 0, Priority 1 (Provisional)
Note
Best,Grace
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship