Dea all,

Please KINDLY SLOW DOWN " Expert" “ Expert”

There are other legal experts than those two law firms that are eligible to comments

How many ideas we have received from these firms which did not suit our case during CCWG WS1? `.

We MUST respect other people having considerable experience and strong legal background than those firs.

When you said in the draft" Breaching repeatedly "  and legal people on which you have full trust  does not say " repeated " may means two , three or more thus without specifying the frequency of breeching, the term " Breaching repeatedly " has no meaning

When you say OCS collectively and unanimously agreed instead of «collectively agreed without objections or abstention still you reject the idea

In the draft, at several occasion the term “will “ has been used.

In a legal document either we use the mandatory term “ shall “ or optional/ quasi mandatory term “ should 2

Please read my comments carefully

KAVOUSS   

2016-08-08 19:22 GMT+02:00 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com>:
Jonathan/Lise,

You are probably ahead of me but, if there is time in our CWG call this week, it might be a good idea to discuss Kavouss's comments.  Allowing the 'experts' to respond to his comments and other CWG members to discuss as well might help although I am not sure he will easily concede.  It would at least document the discussion in a very visible way.

I of course will respect your decision on how to handle this.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Arasteh
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Jari Arkko
Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

Dear Jari
I have made many comments during public comment period for CCWG. Non of them were consulted???

Sent from my iPhone

> On 8 Aug 2016, at 18:44, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
>
>
>> That does not mean that my comments be ignored
>
> No, of course not. What I said was that we have more time to consider additional comments during the public comment period.
>
> Jari
>
>
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship