Just to correct my mistake: I would like to volunteer for DT-C, the Design Team on the CSC. Apologies.

Martin

From: Martin Boyle
Sent: 10 March 2015 16:50
To: 'Duchesneau, Stephanie'; 'jrobinson@afilias.info'; cwg-stewardship@icann.org; 'Lise Fuhr'
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

Hi Jonathan & Lise,

I would also like to volunteer for this DT, please. My SOI is at https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Martin+Boyle+SOI.

Thanks

Martin

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Duchesneau, Stephanie
Sent: 10 March 2015 17:38
To: 'jrobinson@afilias.info'; cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

Hi Jonathan,

I would like to be participate on Design Team B. My SOI can be found below.

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Stephanie+Duchesneau+SOI

Thank you.

Stephanie

Stephanie Duchesneau
Neustar, Inc. / Public Policy Manager
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4^th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2623 Mobile: +1.703.731.2040 Fax: +1.202.533.2623 / www.neustar.biz

The information contained in this email message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:44 AM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

All,

As an additional clarification, please note that DT-A, B and C have now been approved by the co-chairs, with a slight modification to the scope of DT-C, i.e. the removal of consideration of the authorization function since a separate DT will be dealing with that issue.

As such, the co-chairs would welcome expressions of interest as soon as possible for members of DT-B and DT-C taking into account the membership structure:

For Design Team B:

two or three ccTLD representatives
one or two GAC representatives.

For Design Team C:

At a minimum two gTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
At a minimum two ccTLD registry representatives with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
One IANA staff member (current or former)
One non-direct customer representative with operational knowledge of IANA Functions and current reporting requirements
One liaison from NTIA to verify NTIA’s current responsibilities

As noted previously, members of design teams are expected to make the necessary time available to complete the tasks of the design team as well as having the necessary skills and expertise as identified in the proposed membership structure. Those interest to volunteer for a DT are expected to share their expression of interest with the CWG mailing list which is expected to include their Statement of Interest (SOI) or provide a link to the existing SOI as well as their qualification for the DT.

The co-chairs in consultation with the DT lead, will review the volunteers that have come forward and determine the membership of the DT, ensuring sufficient expertise and a balanced membership.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info]
Sent: 09 March 2015 21:50
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

All,

Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation for our call tomorrow.

Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is reflected in the document.

Please note that it contains the following:

· A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process which has been referenced in Annex A.

· A note section as part of the index to provide additional comments as needed

· New prospective DTs added

o L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism),

o M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and

o N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions).

· An updated description for .INT DT to match description in draft transition proposal.

· An ‘expression of interest field’, currently only in the Authorization Function DT-D
(as other expression of interests come in, we’ll create the same for other DTs).

Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed. Where it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the DT emerging.

I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow.

Thanks,

Jonathan