Seun,
I know that a word version was included but the Word Version is a clean Text and it is difficult to identify the changes .I wish to see what was the changes introduced by Greg
I still need the red mark text in WORD VERSION.
Regards
Kavouss

2016-08-07 14:09 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>:

A word version was included in Greg's mail

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos


On 7 Aug 2016 10:36 a.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Grec,
Thank you very much for the amendments. I do not agree with some of them
In order to enable me to provide my counter comments to you, pls provide a word version of your amendment as soon as convinient
Regards
Kavouss


2016-08-07 0:22 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
CWG,

I am forwarding a revised draft of the proposed Community Agreement relating to the IANA IPR.  In addition to any other comments you may have, I draw your attention to the two specific items in the email below: (1) identifying an entity to sign for the names community, and (2) providing a brief description of the IANA Services used by the names community (see Exhibit A for descriptions provided by the other communities).

This will be the subject of further refinement by the IPR collaborative group early in the week, with the goal of initiating a public comment period as soon as possible after the CWG-IANA meeting on Thursday.

Greg

 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hofheimer, Joshua T. <jhofheimer@sidley.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM
Subject: [client com] FW: Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016
To: Client <cwg-client@icann.org>


Dear Client Committee,

 

Attached please find a revised draft of the proposed Community Agreement for your review and comment.  This is an iterative version prepared jointly by counsel (Sidley) to the CWG and counsel to the IETF Trust to reflect the 7-point discussion items.  To be clear, it is still a work in progress, but we believe ready for the CWG to have an opportunity for review.

 

Two important issues to highlight:

1) the Names Community needs to determine who will be the signatory party, acting on behalf of the Names Community, to the Community Agreement.  For your information, the attached draft has the organizations put forward to represent the Numbers and Protocols Communities; and

2) we need a brief description of the IANA services to be provided on behalf of the Names Community.  The following high-level description was included in a draft of the Naming Functions Agreement.  If this is acceptable for including here is well, please advise (or we ask the Client Committee to provide a sufficient description):

 

The “IANA Naming Function” is comprised of:

(a)             Management of the DNS Root Zone (“Root Zone Management”);

(b)             Management of the .INT top-level domain;

(c)              Maintenance of a repository of internationalized domain name tables and label generation rule sets; and

(d)             Provision of other services related to the management of .INT top-level domains, at ICANN’s reasonable request and at ICANN’s expense.

Please provide any comment or feedback as soon as practical, as we are trying to finalize the draft for approval by the various stakeholders and release for public comment by Thursday.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Cheers,

Josh

 

Joshua Hofheimer

Sidley Austin LLP

jhofheimer@sidley.com

(213) 896-6061 (LA direct)

(650) 565-7561 (Palo Alto direct)

(323) 708-2405 (cell)

 

From: iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net [mailto:iana-ipr-bounces@nro.net] On Behalf Of Jorge Contreras
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:01 AM
To: iana-ipr@nro.net
Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

 

All – attached is a draft of the Community Agreement that Josh and I have collaborated on over the past two days.  We believe that it reflects the current requirements of the parties, and submit it for your review and discussion.

 

A clean version, as well as a marked version against the draft of 07-30-16 (in PDF format) are attached.

 

Please note a few items that still need to be completed, including the description of the IANA Names Service, the identities of the CCG representatives, etc.

 

Best regards,

Jorge

 

Jorge L. Contreras

Contreras Legal Strategy LLC

1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710

Washington, DC 20036

 

The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.

 

 

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
Cwg-client mailing list
Cwg-client@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-client



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship



_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship