Milton,

I agree with most of what you say except that the log "privileges" early comments - it simply lists comments when they come in.

Although most comments will come in on the last few days we will probably get a large volume of these given the interest in the topic.

As such we will certainly need some sort of classification/organization of these beyond the raw list - this is just an initial stab at this which I will keep doing  - just thought it would be useful for some on this list.

Cheers.

B.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:

Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in. Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to look at all comments after they all come in.

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

 

All,

 

This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in keeping track of the various postings.

 

Comments on how to improve this welcome.

 

B.,

 

For December 2nd we have the following:

 

Date

From

Summary

20141202

Page Howe

Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained.

20141202

 Graham Schreiber

Garbled paste into body of comment

20141202

 Graham Schreiber

Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed until this is resolved.

A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached.

 

B.