Lise

Thanks for the heads up.

While I appreciate it will not be the CWG’s decision who will be the liaison, I would note that Suzanne Woolf from the Board has been present on a large number of CWG and RFP3 calls. For continuity I think it would be very helpful if Suzanne could fulfil the role.

Thanks,

Donna

DONNA AUSTIN
Policy and Industry Affairs Manager

ARI REGISTRY SERVICES
Melbourne | Los Angeles
P +1 310 890 9655
P +61 3 9866 3710
E donna.austin@ariservices.com
W www.ariservices.com

Follow us on Twitter

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lise Fuhr
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2015 9:59 PM
To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] A liaison from the Board to CWG

Dear All,

During the meeting in Singapore the co-chairs have picked up that ICANN Board is an important stakeholder for this groups as well. We have noticed that there have been involvement from the Board in the CWG work during calls and during the actual meetings in Singapore. Because of this involvement, the fact that the board is a stakeholder and in order to ensure a continuously and open dialogue with the CWG, we find that having a liaison from the board could be helpful. Not that the liaison will have a special status within the group but serve as a link between the CWG  and the ICANN board, in line with how the CCWG has a liaison from ICANN Board.

Jonathan and I intend to approach the board regarding this in the beginning of next week.

Best regards,

Jonathan and Lise