sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Jan 2015 00:46, "Allan MacGillivray" <allan.macgillivray@cira.ca> wrote:
>
> Chris – thanks for volunteering.  We all know that time is very tight so I want to outline how I think we could best optimize our time and energy. 
>
>  
>
>   With such a focus on ‘no Contract Co’ we may also be able to set aside, again, at least for the moment, the CSC and the MRT as I believe there is a high degree of consensus that the functions that these two entities would perform are needed, that is operational oversight and periodic review respectively. 
>

I would say *some functions* but I generally agree with the flow you have proposed; we deal with contract co mechanism replacement before proceeding to making slim the CSC/MRT roles. However, I will strongly note that it's HIGHLY disappointing that CWG is now formerly recognising to build an alternate proposal just few days to submission.
>  
>
> This may seem to be a daunting task, but I would remind you that the core of the CWG proposal ran to only just 7 pages in the December 1 proposal.  I think that together we can put something credible together in a reasonable amount of time. 
>
>  
Well without making unnecessary excuses enormous resource commitment (including f2f) happened on the CWG proposal before Dec so while we will try, I don't think our source of inspiration should be linked to the CWG proposal ;-)
>
> It would be very helpful if the communities and organizations who had significant concerns with Contract Co and who also sought the development of such a proposal could actively participate as I fear it would lack credibility without them.  I am speaking in particular of auDA, SIDN, Google and ALAC.  If I have missed centring anyone out, you are still welcome to volunteer!
>
Do pen me down.

Regards
>  
>
>  
>
> Allan
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> From: Christopher Wilkinson [mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu]
> Sent: January-08-15 5:03 PM
> To: Jonathan Robinson; Allan MacGillivray
> Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
> Importance: High
>
>  
>
> Good evening: In the light of my pervious comments, I would be prepared to volunteer for this function.
>
>  
>
> Regards
>
>  
>
> CW
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On 08 Jan 2015, at 17:42, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
>
>
>
> All,
>
>  
>
> RFP 3 Sub-Group (AKA RFP 3b) - CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
>
>  
>
> Please note this urgent call for volunteers for a sub-group of RFP3.
>
>  
>
> The sub-group is  required to work together to further develop a variant proposal for the CWG which takes account of proposals and comments received by the CWG, particularly as they relate to a so-called “internal to ICANN” option or variant to the original draft proposal of the CWG.
>
>  
>
> Allan Mc Gillivray has offered to assist with co-ordination of the group and it will need a committed team to work with Allan in short order to make the requisite progress.
>
>  
>
> Thank-you.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Jonathan
>
> CWG Co-chair
>
>  
>
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>