Hello,

This updated version indeed looks better however i have a few comments to raise:

1. I will like to confirm if the new hires during the post-transition phase (the 3 year period) would be the decision of the PTI board or that of the ICANN board or that of ICANN staff? or PTI president?

2. While i agree with the last statement on the document[1], i think it may not be in sync with our current response to section 7.1 of the PTI bylaw which i earlier highlighted. I hope my suggested wording (or any other re-wording along that line) will be applied to make the proposed staffing route to be feasible.

Regards
1. After the transition, the PTI Board will be able to review the staffing plan and shared resources arrangement, and determine what if any changes need to be made to ensure a well-functioning PTI.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:

All,

Please be aware of this recently published revised PTI staffing positon from ICANN’s implementation team.

Lise & Jonathan

From: Yuko Green [mailto:yuko.green@icann.org]
Sent: 24 June 2016 02:06
To: iotf@icann.org
Subject: [IOTF] Revised PTI staffing rationale

Dear members of IOTF,

Attached, please find the revised PTI staffing rationale that reflects the discussion from the last IOTF call #13. We welcome any feedback you may have.

Regards,

Yuko Green
Strategic Programs Manager
Global Domains Division
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693
Mobile: +1 310 745 1517
E-mail: yuko.green@icann.org
www.icann.org

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seun Ojedeji,
Federal University Oye-Ekiti
web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
Mobile: +2348035233535
alt email: seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!