Ok, so ICANN's lawyers (internal and external) no longer have special rights. On to the other unanswered questions:


* When and how was the decision made that this closed committee would be the intermediary between the independent law firm and the internet community?

* Is there any reason why the closed committee cannot now be opened up to representatives from across the ICANN community, rather than the very limited four people currently on it?

* Where is this committee intending to do its work? Is there a calendar of meetings? Will it be on conference calls? Are any face-to-face meetings planned? Have meetings already happened?

* Will this closed committee commit to the same transparency and accountability processes that apply to every other part of the IANA transition process? i.e. recorded conference calls, minutes etc

* Is ICANN's legal department still attending the closed committee meetings with the independent law firm? If so, why? And if so how does this committee and ICANN account for the clear conflict of interest?



Kieren













On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,

We have modified our approach to the Client Committee email list.  The only members of the list are now the Client Committee (Jonathan Robinson, Lise Fuhr, Maarten Simon and myself) and the Sidley Austin team, with Grace Abuhamad providing staff support.  The remaining ICANN participants who were members of the list (Samantha Eisner and Theresa Swinehart) have been moved to observer status.  John Jeffrey was previously removed from the mailing list at his request after the counsel selection process concluded.  Kevin Espinola of Jones Day was also previously removed.

If any participants in the CWG wish to be added to the Client Committee mailing list as observers, please let Grace Abuhamad know.

Greg Shatan

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship