Attached is the updated proposal. This version includes the edits listed below. Your comments are requested and welcome until Sunday 23:59 UTC. If you don’t have time to read the whole proposal, I’ve highlighted specific areas in the document that require feedback.

Areas that require feedback:

Paragraph 164 (p.32): needs text
Paragraph 172 (p.34): DT-F to confirm edit
Section IV edits should be reviewed by CWG (Andrew perhaps?)
Section VI edits should be reviewed by CWG (Avri perhaps?)
Footnote (p.65): DT-N to respond to Sidley about status of footnote
Page 73: DT-C to confirm response to Sidley comment
Page 80: DT-M to review footnote
Page 81: DT-M/DT-C to comment on Sidley note
Paragraph 389 (p.92): DT-N/SR/X to define “Review Team Liaison” per Sidley’s comment
Page 111 & 112: Bernard to address Sidley comments

All the comments & edits from Greg, Avri, Sidley, Lise and Andrew.
The following items from today’s call:

Paragraph 123 has been reviewed to be internally consistent
Paragraph 141: adjusted text around CCWG-Accountability structure
Paragraph 167: removed sentence
Paragraph 170: Removed the word “multistakholder" and use 'customer-based' instead)
Added footnote to paragraph 169 about .INT (footnote is also in Annex to section II)
Paragraph 275: fixed composition of IFRT (and also fixed this in SCWG composition)
Annex S: Added disclaimer about term sheet

DT C Charter updates (see Section III and Annex G)
Section IV edits
Section VI edits

As you know, we had a technical glitch with document versions right before the call yesterday. In recovering the version, there were a lot of formatting changes that had to be done. I have attached version 2.5 (the in-between version) so that you have it, but please note that version 3 is the version to work off of. There are still lots of formatting fixes in version 3, but we will work on these over the weekend and on Monday.