Lise and Jonathan:
I raise again (as I did in my email last Monday), my same concerns in regard to the proposed Design Team G - IANA Intellectual Property Rights, including the IANA Trademark and Domain Name, in that the proposed External Trust Model provides that all such property ("iana.org"and other associated marks), and other tangible and intangible property, become property of the (external) Trust whose beneficial owner (equitable title) is the global multistakeholder community.

The above provision of the external Trust model presents an obvious conflict with the proposal of Design Team G. Further, Design Team G, as proposed, does not even purport to deal with any of the pending work of CWG-Stewardship or any component common to all 5 CWG models but, instead, proposes a Design Team to respond to an aspect of a proposal already submitted to ICG by another community--the Numbers Community--to the apparent exclusion of consideration of how that is, or may be, dealt with in any of CWG's 5 proposed models--(a) contract co; (b) external trust; (c) internal; (d) internal trust; (e) integrated.

Maybe I have misunderstood the purpose of CWG "Design Teams." Is it appropriate to propose CWG "Design Teams" merely for the purpose of responding to another Community's (Numbers, Protocols) Proposal which has already been submitted to ICG, before CWG-Stewardship has even developed and submitted its own proposal?

I therefore object to proposed Design Team G as: (1) out of scope; (2) premature.

Best regards,

John Poole