Thanks Marika. The edits you proposed seem non-controversial and constructive so I suggest that Staff makes them. Regarding your comment on Source E, I think it would be good to add the date that the major revisions were made to the GNSO PDP in parentheses after the original date.
Am I correct in assuming that Staff will create a redline version 2 that will highlight all the changes made to what I submitted to the CWG list? It probably would be good to wait until about 10 November to finalize version 2 with all edits that are made and then send it to the CWG list. Those edits can then be accepted and subsequent edits redlined for a version 3 if needed before CWG meeting 6. (I am sure you are way ahead of me on this, but I am saying this for the benefit of everyone on the CWG list.)
During today’s call, we found an error that I commented on in the table in ‘2. Delegation and re-delegation of gTLDs’. A column needs to be added in the ‘Done by’ section after the ‘IANA column’ titled ‘RZM’ with a footnote that says, RZM = Root Zone Maintainer and an ‘x’ needs to be added in that column for step 2-8.
Chuck
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:49 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; cwg-stewardship@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Transition CWG RFP Section 2A Proposal 3 November 2014 Draft
Importance: High
Chuck, sub-team members,
Thanks for all your hard work on this document. Please find attached for your consideration some suggested edits in relation to the sections concerning the GNSO Policy Development Process.
Best regards,
Marika
From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@verisign.com>
Date: Monday 3 November 2014 23:22
To: "cwg-stewardship@icann.org" <cwg-stewardship@icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] IANA Stewardship Transition CWG RFP Section 2A Proposal – 3 November 2014 Draft
Attached is a copy of the IANA Stewardship Transition CWG RFP Section 2A Proposal from Subgroup 1-2A-2B for review and comment by the full CWG. Note that there is one section that is still being worked and that is noted in this draft; hopefully that work will be completed this week.
Lise has asked me to provide an overview of this as well as for the Section 1 draft that was distributed to the CWG list last Friday in the CWG meeting tomorrow. I will be happy to respond to any questions you have in the meeting tomorrow as well as on the list, and I am sure that other members of the subgroup would be happy to do the same.
The subgroup will continue to serve as a resource for Sections 1 and 2A as the full CWG reviews them. We are currently working on Section 2B and hope to have a draft for that by the end of the week.
I believe that all three sections will provide very helpful context for the work going on in Subgroup 3.
Finally, let me acknowledge the members of our subgroup:
· Allan MacGillivray (ccNSO)
· Chuck Gomes (GNSO) – Rapporteur/Coordinator
· Kieren McCarthy
· Seun Ojedeji (ALAC)
· Tracy Hackshaw (GAC)
· Fouad Bajwa (ALAC)
· Olivier Crépin-Leblond (ALAC)
· Paul Kane (ccTLD)
· Holly Raiche (ALAC)
· Martin Boyle (ccNSO)
· Sivasubramanian Muthusamy (ALAC)
· Phil Corwin (GNSO)
I also want to express thanks to Bernie Turcotte because he has been an invaluable asset in the staff support he has provided to our team. And special thanks need to be said to Kieren for using his excellent writing abilities and spending extremely long hours editing our documents.
We are not done with our work yet, but it has been a good team effort so far.
Chuck